From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | t(dot)larionov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16953: OOB access while converting "interval" to char |
Date: | 2021-04-12 03:13:02 |
Message-ID: | 20210412031302.tquch5rg5j3eiut3@nol |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:04:23PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:58:51PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Yep. The regression tests show what I would expect. I'll check in
> > details later.
>
> I have spent some time on that today and applied this patch down to
> 9.6, after adding more comments and simplifying a bit the calculation
> method used. Instead of using the "mon" variable to store an
> intermediate result, I have simplified things so as this only uses
> tm->tm_mon, and "mon" for the position in the roman-numeral array is
> adjusted only once.
Thanks Michael! I thought we'd want to keep the original calculation for
consistency, but directly computing the needed offset is clearly simpler to
read!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2021-04-12 17:19:28 | BUG #16960: Illegal reflective access operation |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-04-12 03:04:23 | Re: BUG #16953: OOB access while converting "interval" to char |