From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using COPY FREEZE in pgbench |
Date: | 2021-03-21 06:10:15 |
Message-ID: | 20210321.151015.1423894752928396036.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> V3 works for me and looks ok. I changed it to ready in the CF app.
>
> Thank you for your review!
Unfortunately it seems cfbot is not happy with the patch.
# Failed test 'pgbench scale 1 initialization status (got 1 vs expected 0)'
# at t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl line 116.
# Failed test 'pgbench scale 1 initialization stderr /(?^:creating foreign keys)/'
# at t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl line 116.
# 'dropping old tables...
# creating tables...
# creating 2 partitions...
# creating primary keys...
# vacuuming...
# generating data (client-side)...
# 100000 of 100000 tuples (100%) done (elapsed 0.02 s, remaining 0.00 s)
# ERROR: cannot perform COPY FREEZE on a partitioned table
# pgbench: fatal: PQendcopy failed
I think pgbench needs to check whether partitioning option is
specified or not. If specified, pgbench should not use COPY
FREEZE. Attached v4 patch does this.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench_freeze_v4.diff | text/x-patch | 2.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2021-03-21 06:39:31 | Re: new release pspg |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-03-21 05:22:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods (mac+lz4.h) |