From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Nicer error when connecting to standby with hot_standby=off |
Date: | 2021-03-09 14:07:35 |
Message-ID: | 20210309140735.GA8007@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Mar-09, James Coleman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 8:47 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-Mar-07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 3:39 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Great, so we're agreed on the messages to emit. James, are you updating
> > your patch, considering Fujii's note about the new signal and pmstate
> > that need to be added?
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but I was under the impression the
> "prefer the former message" meant we were not adding a new signal and
> pmstate?
Eh, I read that differently. I was proposing two options for the DETAIL
line in that case:
> DETAIL: Hot standby mode is disabled.
> or maybe
> DETAIL: Consistent state has not yet been reached, and hot standby mode is disabled.
and both Fujii and Magnus said they prefer the first option over the
second option. I don't read any of them as saying that they would like
to do something else (including not doing anything).
Maybe I misinterpreted them?
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Coleman | 2021-03-09 14:11:53 | Re: Nicer error when connecting to standby with hot_standby=off |
Previous Message | James Coleman | 2021-03-09 14:03:16 | Re: Nicer error when connecting to standby with hot_standby=off |