From: | "alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: libpq debug log |
Date: | 2021-03-05 13:41:09 |
Message-ID: | 20210305134109.GA21852@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Mar-05, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > But I think passing the message start address explicitly might be
> > better than having it understand the buffering behavior in enough
> > detail to know where to find the message. Part of the point here
> > (IMO) is to decouple the tracing logic from the core libpq logic, in
> > hopes of not having common-mode bugs.
>
> Ouch, you're perfectly right. Then let's make the signature:
>
> void pqLogMessage(PGconn *conn, const char *message, bool toServer);
Yeah, looks good! I agree that going this route will result in more
trustworthy trace output.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-03-05 13:43:51 | Re: n_mod_since_analyze isn't reset at table truncation |
Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2021-03-05 13:16:35 | Re: Which PG version does CVE-2021-20229 affected? |