Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Date: 2021-02-23 00:15:31
Message-ID: 20210223001531.GA29197@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Feb-22, Álvaro Herrera wrote:

> Here's an updated patch.
>
> I haven't added commentary or documentation to account for the new
> assumption, per Matthias' comment and Robert's discussion thereof.

Done that. I also restructured the code a bit, since one line in
ComputedXidHorizons was duplicative.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
Tom: There seems to be something broken here.
Teodor: I'm in sackcloth and ashes... Fixed.
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/482D1632.8010507@sigaev.ru

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Teach-VACUUM-to-ignore-CIC.patch text/x-diff 5.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-02-23 01:07:19 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-02-23 00:08:51 Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues