| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Date: | 2021-02-05 14:46:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20210205144632.GA11177@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Mark
On 2021-Feb-05, Mark Rofail wrote:
> I disagree -- I think we should get the second patch in, and consider it
> > a requisite for the other one.
>
> I just want to make sure I got your last message right. We should work on
> adding the <<@ and @>> operators and their GIN logic as a separate patch
> then submit the FKARRAY as a future patch?
Well, *I* think it makes sense to do it that way. I said so three years
ago :-)
https://postgr.es/m/20180410135917.odjh5coa4cjatz5v@alvherre.pgsql
> So basically reverse the order of the patches.
Yeah.
Thanks a lot for your persistence, by the way.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
"We're here to devour each other alive" (Hobbes)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-02-05 15:05:21 | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-02-05 14:43:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |