Re: mkid reference

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mkid reference
Date: 2021-01-25 15:40:43
Message-ID: 20210125154043.GB27081@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 02:20:58PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I found man pages for mkid online --- it's apparently a ctags-like
> > code indexing tool, not something for patches. So maybe Bruce still
> > uses it, or maybe not. But as long as we've also got make_ctags and
> > make_etags in there, I don't have a problem with leaving make_mkid.
> >
> > make_diff, on the other hand, certainly looks like technology whose
> > time has passed. I wonder about pgtest, too.
>
> I'll go kill make_diff then -- quicker than fixing the docs of it.
>
> As for pgtest, that one looks a bit interesting as well -- but it's
> been patched on as late as 9.5 and in 2018, so it seems at least Bruce
> uses it :)

Yes, that is how I noticed the ecpg/preproc.y warning this past weekend.

> While at it, what point is "codelines" adding?

That is the script I use to generate code line counts when comparing
releases. I thought it should be in the tree so others can reproduce my
numbers.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo NAGATA 2021-01-25 15:57:04 Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-25 15:38:40 Re: mkid reference