From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Faulty HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED hintbit combination |
Date: | 2021-01-24 16:01:33 |
Message-ID: | 20210124160133.GA32557@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Jan-24, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> + /*
> + * Do not allow tuples with invalid combinations of hint bits to be placed
> + * on a page. These combinations are detected as corruption by the
> + * contrib/amcheck logic, so if you disable one or both of these
> + * assertions, make corresponding changes there.
> + */
> + Assert(!((tuple->t_data->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY) &&
> + (tuple->t_data->t_infomask2 & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED)));
>
>
> I attach a simple self contained script to reproduce the problem, the last
> UPDATE triggering the Assert.
>
> I'm not really familiar with this part of the code, so it's not exactly clear
> to me if some logic is missing in compute_new_xmax_infomask() /
> heap_prepare_insert(), or if this should actually be an allowed combination of
> hint bit.
Hmm, it's probably a bug in compute_new_xmax_infomask. I don't think
the combination is sensible.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
"There is evil in the world. There are dark, awful things. Occasionally, we get
a glimpse of them. But there are dark corners; horrors almost impossible to
imagine... even in our worst nightmares." (Van Helsing, Dracula A.D. 1972)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mahendra Singh Thalor | 2021-01-24 16:06:43 | Re: Faulty HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED hintbit combination |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2021-01-24 13:20:58 | Re: mkid reference |