Re: Key management with tests

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Key management with tests
Date: 2021-01-18 18:58:20
Message-ID: 20210118185820.GA29673@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:42:54AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Personally, but I admit that there's legitimate reasons to differ on
> that note, I don't think it's reasonable for a feature this invasive to
> commit preliminary patches without the major subsequent patches being in
> a shape that allows reviewing the whole picture.

OK, if that is a requirement, I can't help anymore since there are
already complaints that the patch is too large to review, even if broken
into pieces. Please let me know what the community decides.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Kincaid 2021-01-18 19:00:21 Re: Key management with tests
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2021-01-18 18:56:13 Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table