Re: support for MERGE

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: support for MERGE
Date: 2021-01-13 12:58:30
Message-ID: 20210113125830.GA9939@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Jan-13, Simon Riggs wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 1:44 AM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> > 8) varlena.c
> >
> > Again, why are these changes to length checks in a MERGE patch?
>
> Nothing I added, IIRC, nor am I aware of why that would exist.

Sorry, this was a borked merge.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"No hay ausente sin culpa ni presente sin disculpa" (Prov. francés)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-01-13 13:09:23 Re: remove unneeded pstrdup in fetch_table_list
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-01-13 12:56:47 Re: multi-install PostgresNode