Re: Proposal: Global Index

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>, "heikki(dot)linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Global Index
Date: 2021-01-11 19:23:13
Message-ID: 20210111192313.GI4320@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:37:02PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> However, there is a VACUUM amplification effect to worry about here
...
> That's not necessarily a death sentence for every use case, but it's
> going to be pretty bad for tables that are big and heavily updated.

Yeah, I had not really gotten that far in my thinking, but someone is
going to need to create a POC and then we need to test it to see if it
offers a reasonably valuable feature.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-11 19:25:55 Re: Proposal: Global Index
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2021-01-11 19:19:22 Re: Key management with tests