Re: list of extended statistics on psql

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: list of extended statistics on psql
Date: 2021-01-07 14:47:13
Message-ID: 20210107144713.GA8872@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Jan-07, Tomas Vondra wrote:

> On 1/7/21 1:46 AM, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:

> > I overlooked the check for MCV in the logic building query
> > because I created the patch as a new feature on PG14.
> > I'm not sure whether we should do back patch or not. However, I'll
> > add the check on the next patch because it is useful if you decide to
> > do the back patch on PG10, 11, 12, and 13.
>
> BTW perhaps a quick look at the other \d commands would show if there are
> precedents. I didn't have time for that.

Yes, we do promise that new psql works with older servers.

I think we would not backpatch any of this, though.

--
Álvaro Herrera

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-07 15:02:14 Re: Key management with tests
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2021-01-07 14:29:12 Re: Error on failed COMMIT