From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <sriggs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Change replication connection log format to allow for a database |
Date: | 2010-03-25 17:00:18 |
Message-ID: | 20210.1269536418@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I'm afraid this doesn't translate well:
>>
>>> --- 222,232 ----
>>> */
>>> if (am_walsender)
>>> ereport(LOG,
>>> ! (errmsg("replication connection authorized: user=%s host=%s%s%s",
>>> ! port->user_name,
>>> ! port->remote_host, port->remote_port[0] ? " port=" : "",
>>> ! port->remote_port)));
>>> !
>>> else if (Log_connections)
>>> ereport(LOG,
>>> (errmsg("connection authorized: user=%s database=%s",
> Ok, I just realized that this was copy-pasted from BackendInitialize, so
> I guess it's OK as it is...
Two flat-out violations of our message style guidelines doesn't make it
right. I agree with your proposed change for both.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-25 18:57:27 | Re: pgsql: Change replication connection log format to allow for a database |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-03-25 16:54:57 | Re: pgsql: Change replication connection log format to allow for a database |