From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Better client reporting for "immediate stop" shutdowns |
Date: | 2020-12-28 19:14:28 |
Message-ID: | 20201228191428.p5bhcvd4ixsuyifd@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-12-28 13:25:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The most straightforward way to do that is to introduce a new error
> level. Having to renumber existing levels is a bit of a pain, but
> I'm not aware of anything that should break in source-code terms.
> We make similar ABI breaks in every major release.
I don't see a problem either.
> /* Select default errcode based on elevel */
> if (elevel >= ERROR)
> edata->sqlerrcode = ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> - else if (elevel == WARNING)
> + else if (elevel >= WARNING)
> edata->sqlerrcode = ERRCODE_WARNING;
> else
> edata->sqlerrcode = ERRCODE_SUCCESSFUL_COMPLETION;
> @@ -2152,6 +2157,7 @@ write_eventlog(int level, const char *line, int len)
> eventlevel = EVENTLOG_INFORMATION_TYPE;
> break;
> case WARNING:
> + case WARNING_CLIENT_ONLY:
> eventlevel = EVENTLOG_WARNING_TYPE;
> break;
> case ERROR:
> [...]
I don't think it needs to be done right now, but I again want to suggest
it'd be nice if we split log levels into a bitmask. If we bits, separate
from the log level, for do-not-log-to-client and do-not-log-to-server
some of this code would imo look nicer.
Looks good to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-12-28 20:01:50 | Re: Better client reporting for "immediate stop" shutdowns |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-12-28 18:25:14 | Re: Better client reporting for "immediate stop" shutdowns |