| From: | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | venkata786 k <venkata(dot)k786(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL HA |
| Date: | 2020-12-28 10:20:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20201228112019.3fa42567@firost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 05:51:22 +0530
venkata786 k <venkata(dot)k786(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Could you please share postgresql's best active(R/W)-active(R/W) (multi
> master replication) solutions.
> My Team is thinking about implementing active-active replacing master-slave.
Symmetric replication bring a lot of complexity in various layers:
application, architecture, backups.
Why do you need symmetric replication? Do you have any issues with asymmetric
replication?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2020-12-28 11:15:54 | Re: PostgreSQL HA |
| Previous Message | Brajendra Pratap Singh | 2020-12-28 06:49:22 | Partitioned Table conversion to Non-Partition table in postgresql open source |