| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |
| Date: | 2020-12-21 22:17:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20201221221752.GA886@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 03:00:32PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> I agree with Stephen; so maybe that part of the Wiki needs to be updated
> instead of having it sit there for use as a hammer when someone disagrees with
> a proffered patch.
>
> Or maybe consider that "a patch" doesn't only mean "implement" - it is simply
> another language through which desirability and design can also be
> communicated. The author gets to decide how wordy their prose is and choosing
> a wordy but concise language that is understandable by the vast majority of the
> target audience seems like it should be considered acceptable.
If you want to debate that TODO section, you will need to start a new
thread. I suggest Alastair's patch also appear in a new thread.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-12-22 00:39:35 | Re: Add statistics to pg_stat_wal view for wal related parameter tuning |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-12-21 22:00:32 | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |