Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round
Date: 2020-12-08 03:38:19
Message-ID: 20201208033819.ihahxgoklqsywseu@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-12-01 12:08:10 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2020-12-01 21:04:44 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > Andres investigated a few days ago, managed to reproduce the issue locally,
> > and has one line patch. I'm unsure if it should be prevently back-patched,
> > though.
>
> I see no reason not to backpatch - it's more correct for past versions
> of LLVM as well.

I pushed that now.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-12-08 03:39:55 Re: upcoming API changes for LLVM 12
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-08 03:32:37 Re: vac_update_datfrozenxid will raise "wrong tuple length" if pg_database tuple contains toast attribute.