| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT |
| Date: | 2020-12-04 23:32:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20201204233239.GA11449@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Dec-04, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> On 12/4/20, 1:47 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > On the UI of this patch, you're proposing to add the option FAST. I'm
> > not a fan of this option name and propose that (if we have it) we use
> > the name SPREAD instead (defaults to false).
> >
> > Now we don't actually explain the term "spread" much in the documentation;
> > we just say "the writes are spread". But it seems more natural to build
> > on that adjective rather than "fast/slow".
>
> Here is a version of the patch that uses SPREAD instead of FAST.
WFM.
Instead of adding checkpt_option_list, how about utility_option_list?
It seems intended for reuse.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2020-12-05 00:11:13 | Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2020-12-04 23:21:23 | Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT |