From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
Cc: | legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all |
Date: | 2020-12-03 08:53:59 |
Message-ID: | 20201203085359.GC8050@nol |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:40:22AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> Hello
>
> > To get an increase in the number of records that means that the same
> > statement
> > would appear at top level AND nested level. This seems a corner case with
> > very low
> > (neglectible) occurence rate.
>
> +1
> I think splitting fields into plans_toplevel / plans_nested will be less convenient. And more code with higher chance of copypaste errors
As I mentioned in a previous message, I really have no idea if that would be a
corner case or not. For instance with native partitioning, the odds to have
many different query executed both at top level and as a nested statement may
be quite higher.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2020-12-03 08:57:22 | Re: Multi Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS - revived patch |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-12-03 08:52:08 | Re: pg_stat_statements oddity with track = all |