From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SELECT INTO deprecation |
Date: | 2020-12-02 19:57:33 |
Message-ID: | 20201202195733.GE9795@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 12:58:36PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Peter Eisentraut (peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com) wrote:
> > While reading about deprecating and removing various things in
> > other threads, I was wondering about how deprecated SELECT INTO
> > is. There are various source code comments about this, but the
> > SELECT INTO reference page only contains soft language like
> > "recommended". I'm proposing the attached patch to stick a more
> > explicit deprecation notice right at the top.
>
> I don't see much value in this. Users already have 5 years to adapt
> their code to new major versions of PG and that strikes me as plenty
> enough time and is why we support multiple major versions of PG for
> so long. Users who keep pace and update for each major version
> aren't likely to have issue making this change since they're already
> used to regularly updating their code for new major versions, while
> others are going to complain no matter when we remove it and will
> ignore any deprecation notices we put out there, so there isn't much
> point in them.
+1 for removing it entirely and including this prominently in the
release notes.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-12-02 20:02:44 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-12-02 19:50:11 | Re: Off-Schedule Minor Release Consideration? |