From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Chloe Dives <Chloe(dot)Dives(at)cantabcapital(dot)com>, Chris Wilson <chris(dot)wilson(at)cantabcapital(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: walsender bug: stuck during shutdown |
Date: | 2020-11-25 18:45:46 |
Message-ID: | 20201125184546.GA8160@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Nov-25, Fujii Masao wrote:
> But whether MyWalSnd->write is InvalidRecPtr or not, if it's behind sentPtr,
> walsender should keep waiting for the ack to all the sent message to be
> replied, i.e., isn't this expected behavior of normal shutdown? That is,
> if we want to shutdown walsender even when the client side doesn't
> reply message, immediate shutdown should be used or the client side
> should be terminated, instead?
I don't think "waiting forever" can be considered the expected behavior;
this has caused what are nominally production outages several times
already, since we sent a shutdown signal to the server and it never
completed shutting down.
If you want to propose a better patch to address the issue, feel free,
but keeping things as they are seems a bad idea to me.
(Hmm, maybe another idea would be to have WalSndDone cause a keepalive
message to be sent to the client and complete shut down when we get a
reply to that.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Christensen | 2020-11-25 18:45:51 | Re: [PATCH] Add `truncate` option to subscription commands |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-11-25 18:41:15 | Re: Deleting older versions in unique indexes to avoid page splits |