Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)
Date: 2020-11-24 02:03:32
Message-ID: 20201124020332.GA12437@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote:

> I never cared that much for "is_log_level_output" either. Thinking
> about renaming it to "should_output_to_log()", and then the new function
> would be "should_output_to_client()".

Ah, that sounds nicely symmetric and grammatical.

Thanks!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-11-24 02:04:22 Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-11-24 02:00:20 Re: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState?