From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array" |
Date: | 2020-11-23 15:06:30 |
Message-ID: | 20201123150630.GA10860@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Nov-17, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though.
>
> > Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current
> > message is just wrong, right?
>
> It's incomplete, for sure. Doesn't mention nulls either.
So let's go with this one.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
arraylen.patch | text/x-diff | 4.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-23 15:18:53 | Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array" |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2020-11-23 14:45:18 | Re: [bug+patch] Inserting DEFAULT into generated columns from VALUES RTE |