From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Soumyadeep Chakraborty <soumyadeep2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Refactor pg_rewind code and make it work against a standby |
Date: | 2020-11-20 00:38:11 |
Message-ID: | 20201120003811.iknhqwatitw2vvxf@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-11-15 17:10:53 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Yep, quite right. Fixed that way, thanks for the debugging!
I locally, on a heavily modified branch (AIO support), started to get
consistent failures in this test. I *suspect*, but am not sure, that
it's the test's fault, not the fault of modifications.
As far as I can tell, after the pg_rewind call, there's no guarantee
that node_c has fully caught up to the 'in A, after C was promoted'
insertion on node a. Thus at the check_query() I sometimes get just 'in
A, before promotion' back.
After adding a wait that problem seems to be fixed. Here's what I did
diff --git i/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/007_standby_source.pl w/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/007_standby_source.pl
index f6abcc2d987..48898bef2f5 100644
--- i/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/007_standby_source.pl
+++ w/src/bin/pg_rewind/t/007_standby_source.pl
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ $node_c->safe_psql('postgres', "checkpoint");
# - you need to rewind.
$node_a->safe_psql('postgres',
"INSERT INTO tbl1 VALUES ('in A, after C was promoted')");
+$lsn = $node_a->lsn('insert');
# Also insert a new row in the standby, which won't be present in the
# old primary.
@@ -142,6 +143,8 @@ $node_primary = $node_c;
# Run some checks to verify that C has been successfully rewound,
# and connected back to follow B.
+$node_b->wait_for_catchup('node_c', 'replay', $lsn);
+
check_query(
'SELECT * FROM tbl1',
qq(in A
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-20 00:40:23 | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix compilation on mac with Xcode >= 11.4. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-11-20 00:33:25 | Re: scram-sha-256 broken with FIPS and OpenSSL 1.0.2 |