Re: pg_upgrade from 12 to 13 failes with plpython2

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Marcin Giedz <marcin(dot)giedz(at)arise(dot)pl>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade from 12 to 13 failes with plpython2
Date: 2020-11-18 21:01:24
Message-ID: 20201118210124.GB13839@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:25:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I think one big problem is that when pg_upgrade fails in this way, users
> > are required to do some complex system catalog queries to diagnose the
> > cause. Is there a way to simplify this for them?
>
> Maybe pg_upgrade should print the actual function names, not just the
> probin values.

It is done that way so we don't overwhelm them with lots of function
names, and they can focus on the library. I was thinking of showing
them a query that would allow them to investigate.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Post Gresql 2020-11-18 21:08:11 Re: create type with %type or %rowtype
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-18 20:25:56 Re: pg_upgrade from 12 to 13 failes with plpython2