Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New "function tables" in V13 documentation
Date: 2020-11-11 22:03:50
Message-ID: 20201111220350.GB25838@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 07:46:21PM -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 3:57 PM Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> >
> > In case someone is interested: there is a little discussion going on on Reddit whether the new format of presenting functions in V13 is a step backwards:
> >
> > https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/jpi0rp/does_anyone_else_feel_like_the_v13_docs_are_a/
>
> It's more than a little ironic that reddit's "old" format (still
> visible via old.reddit.com) is objectively clearer and better along
> exactly the same lines.

I think it is funny that the Redit thread thinks we made the format
change because of mobile, but it was actually more for PDF output, which
is more old-school than even web pages.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raul Kaubi 2020-11-11 22:22:18 Discovering postgres binary directory location
Previous Message Jitendra Loyal 2020-11-11 18:16:20 Re: Check constraints do not seem to be working!!!