Re: Online checksums verification in the backend

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend
Date: 2020-11-02 01:50:06
Message-ID: 20201102015006.itfb4e7t6ccof3ac@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

On 2020-11-02 10:45:00 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 05:39:40PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'm a bit limited writing - one handed for a while following an injury
> > on Friday...
>
> Oops. Take care.

Thanks!

> > On 2020-11-02 10:05:25 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > There is no place doing that on HEAD.
> >
> > Err?
> > How is this not doing IO while holding a buffer mapping lock?
>
> Well, other than the one we are discussing of course :)

I am not following? Were you just confirming that its not a thing we do?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2020-11-02 01:58:11 Re: Parallel Append can break run-time partition pruning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-11-02 01:45:00 Re: Online checksums verification in the backend