| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Online checksums verification in the backend |
| Date: | 2020-10-29 00:39:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20201029003942.GA6118@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 08:12:42AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> As far as I can see the issue is that the pfree(path) in
> check_relation_fork() should be outside the for loop.
Yes, this would be triggered if more than one page is found as broken
in a single SRF. Fixed, thanks Shinoda-san.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2020-10-29 00:48:46 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-29 00:20:09 | Re: pg_prewarm bgworker could break fast shutdown |