Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html.
Date: 2020-10-27 17:21:57
Message-ID: 20201027172157.GP4951@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied the attached patch to all branches to remove the
> > paragraph.
>
> The removal only happened in HEAD, so I'm unclear on why you back-patched
> this doc change?

Uh, at the top of all my branches, I typed:

ls */src/tools/thread

and saw no hits in _any_ of the branches. I now see that the problem
wasn't that /src/_tools_/thread was removed but that the docs referenced
it instead of src/_test_/thread. However, it doesn't compile because of
the pg_printf reference. I am thinking removing the paragraph in the
back branches was the right thing to do all along. Agreed?

> But thanks for finding the reference; I'd only searched for test/thread,
> not tools/thread. Looks like src/template/netbsd has an old reference
> too.

Remove that too?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-10-27 17:32:49 Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-10-27 16:54:36 Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html.