| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html. |
| Date: | 2020-10-27 17:21:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20201027172157.GP4951@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied the attached patch to all branches to remove the
> > paragraph.
>
> The removal only happened in HEAD, so I'm unclear on why you back-patched
> this doc change?
Uh, at the top of all my branches, I typed:
ls */src/tools/thread
and saw no hits in _any_ of the branches. I now see that the problem
wasn't that /src/_tools_/thread was removed but that the docs referenced
it instead of src/_test_/thread. However, it doesn't compile because of
the pg_printf reference. I am thinking removing the paragraph in the
back branches was the right thing to do all along. Agreed?
> But thanks for finding the reference; I'd only searched for test/thread,
> not tools/thread. Looks like src/template/netbsd has an old reference
> too.
Remove that too?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-27 17:32:49 | Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-27 16:54:36 | Re: Missing directory is mentioned on page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/libpq-exec.html. |