Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Date: 2020-10-15 16:20:39
Message-ID: 20201015162039.GA1329@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Sep-30, Craig Ringer wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 22:09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:

> > I happened to come across this thread by accident, and I tend to agree
> > that we need to install both isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress to
> > the pgxs dirs, just like we do pg_regress. I can't find that
> > isolationtester is installed anywhere though; maybe that changed after
> > you posted this. Anyway, this version of the patch installs both.

> I think rules were added to allow the isolation tester to be installed with
> an explicit make -C src/test/isolation install, but not added to the
> default "install" target.
>
> I agree it should just be installed.

Pushed, thanks.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2020-10-15 16:26:34 Re: Packaging - Packages names consistency (RPM)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-10-15 16:01:21 Re: Aw: Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol