From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Restore replication protocol's duplicate command tags |
Date: | 2020-10-15 12:52:21 |
Message-ID: | 20201015125221.GA32197@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Oct-15, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 6:07 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > On 2020-Oct-14, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Hm, this failed on sidewinder.
>
> Now, curculio [1] also seems to be failing for the same reason.
Yeah ... and now they're both green. Anyway clearly the test is
unstable.
> For the initial table sync, we use below in some of the tests (see
> 001_rep_changes):
Ah yeah, thanks, this should work. Pushed, we'll see how it goes.
Thanks,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-10-15 12:53:08 | pgsql: Fix query in new test to check tables are synced |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-10-15 12:51:42 | pgsql: Fix query in new test to check tables are synced |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Fan | 2020-10-15 13:12:19 | improve the algorithm cached_plan_cost with real planning time? |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-10-15 12:43:48 | Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...) |