Re: pgsql: Restore replication protocol's duplicate command tags

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Restore replication protocol's duplicate command tags
Date: 2020-10-15 12:52:21
Message-ID: 20201015125221.GA32197@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Oct-15, Amit Kapila wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 6:07 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > On 2020-Oct-14, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Hm, this failed on sidewinder.
>
> Now, curculio [1] also seems to be failing for the same reason.

Yeah ... and now they're both green. Anyway clearly the test is
unstable.

> For the initial table sync, we use below in some of the tests (see
> 001_rep_changes):

Ah yeah, thanks, this should work. Pushed, we'll see how it goes.

Thanks,

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-10-15 12:53:08 pgsql: Fix query in new test to check tables are synced
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-10-15 12:51:42 pgsql: Fix query in new test to check tables are synced

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2020-10-15 13:12:19 improve the algorithm cached_plan_cost with real planning time?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-10-15 12:43:48 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)