Re: Probably typo in multixact.c

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 10:26:39AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 01:15:35AM +0000, Hou, Zhijie wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In multixact.c I found some comments like the following:
> >
> > * Similar to AtEOX_MultiXact but for COMMIT PREPARED
> > * Discard the local MultiXactId cache like in AtEOX_MultiXact
> >
> > Since there's no function called "AtEOX_MultiXact" in the code,
> > I think the "AtEOX_MultiXact" may be a typo.
> >
> > AtEOXact_MultiXact seems to be the right function here.
>
> Yes, that looks like a simple typo to me as well.
> AtEOXact_MultiXact() shares portions of the logics in
> PostPrepare_MultiXact and multixact_twophase_postcommit.

FYI, this patch was applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee