Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)protonmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date: 2020-09-30 07:39:08
Message-ID: 20200930073908.GQ1996@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:51:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This patch had no reviews, unfortunately it cannot be applied
> cleanly. Could you send a rebase please?

This had no replies after two weeks, so I have marked the patch as
RwF. Please feel free to resubmit if you are planning to work more on
that.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-30 07:41:51 Re: Adding Support for Copy callback functionality on COPY TO api
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-30 07:37:23 Re: [PATCH] Allow queries in WHEN expression of FOR EACH STATEMENT triggers