From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: scram-sha-256 broken with FIPS and OpenSSL 1.0.2 |
Date: | 2020-09-25 19:13:15 |
Message-ID: | 20200925191315.GB7199@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:56:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 01:36:44AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> However, again, the SCRAM
> >> implementation would already appear to fail that requirement because it
> >> uses a custom HMAC implementation, and HMAC is listed in FIPS 140-2 as a
> >> covered algorithm.
> >
> > Ugh. But is there any available FIPS-approved library code that could be
> > used instead?
>
> That's a good point, and I think that this falls down to use OpenSSL's
> HMAC_* interface for this job when building with OpenSSL:
> https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1/man3/HMAC.html
>
> Worth noting that these have been deprecated in 3.0.0 as per the
> rather-recent commit dbde472, where they recommend the use of
> EVP_MAC_*() instead.
Would a FIPS server only be able to talk to a FIPS client, or would our
internal code produce the same output?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-09-25 19:14:04 | Re: gs_group_1 crashing on 13beta2/s390x |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-09-25 19:05:00 | Re: history file on replica and double switchover |