Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.
Date: 2020-09-10 13:12:10
Message-ID: 20200910131210.GA23589@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Sep-10, Amit Kapila wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:03 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> The comments already say what you said in the second suggestion:"The
> caller must rely on timestamp stored in *ts iff the function returns
> true.". Read iff "as if and only if"

I think "must" should be "may" there, if we're nitpicking.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-09-10 13:45:29 Re: Optimising compactify_tuples()
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2020-09-10 12:53:07 Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns