| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData() |
| Date: | 2020-09-05 01:31:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20200905013124.GA2149@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:35:19AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think it's best to close the entry. There's substantial further wins
> possible, in particular not acquiring ProcArrayLock in GetSnapshotData()
> when the cache is valid improves performance substantially. But it's
> non-trivial enough that it's probably best dealth with in a separate
> patch / CF entry.
Cool, thanks for updating the CF entry.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-05 01:37:38 | Re: Concurrent failure in create_am with buildfarm member conchuela |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-09-05 00:13:32 | Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir() |