Re: report expected contrecord size

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: report expected contrecord size
Date: 2020-09-04 19:00:26
Message-ID: 20200904190026.GA5193@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Sep-03, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2020-Sep-03, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Uh ... is it really possible for gotlen to be more than total_len?
> >> (I've not looked at the surrounding code here, but that seems weird.)
>
> > Well, as I understand, total_len comes from one page, and gotlen comes
> > from the continuation record(s) in the next page(s) of WAL. So if
> > things are messed up, it could happen. (This *is* the code that
> > validates the record, so it can't make too many assumptions.)
>
> Got it. No further objections.

Many thanks for looking! Pushed now.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-09-04 19:01:37 Re: Disk-based hash aggregate's cost model
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-09-04 18:53:04 Re: Improving connection scalability: GetSnapshotData()