From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | "Inoue, Hiroshi" <h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup |
Date: | 2020-09-03 10:14:15 |
Message-ID: | 20200903101109.GA15662@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:11:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> From what I can see on this thread, we could just remove currtid() per
> the arguments of the RETURNING ctid clause supported since PG 8.2, but
> it would make more sense to me to just remove both currtid/currtid2()
> at once.
The CF bot is complaining, so here is a rebase for the main patch.
Opinions are welcome about the arguments of upthread.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Remove-currtid-and-currtid2.patch | text/x-diff | 13.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-09-03 10:19:35 | Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-09-03 09:56:35 | Re: default partition and concurrent attach partition |