From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reloptions for table access methods |
Date: | 2020-09-01 16:20:08 |
Message-ID: | 20200901162008.GA12330@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Aug-31, Jeff Davis wrote:
> fillRelOptions() validates when filling in a struct to make sure there
> aren't "leftover" options. It does this using a hard-coded parsing
> table that is not extensible.
Hmm, I think that if we're going to do this, we should do it for all
AMs, not just table AMs, since surely index AMs also want extensible
reloptions; and I think that makes the 'validate' mechanism dead code
and so we should remove it.
I think this means that you can have tables with mistyped options, and
you'd not get an error message about them. Is that right? Is that what
we want?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-09-01 16:29:22 | Re: Kerberos support broken on MSVC builds for Windows x64? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2020-09-01 16:12:17 | Re: Kerberos support broken on MSVC builds for Windows x64? |