From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Clang UndefinedBehaviorSanitize (Postgres14) Detected undefined-behavior |
Date: | 2020-08-31 20:50:18 |
Message-ID: | 20200831205018.qya6rkktlo6w5hal@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-08-31 17:35:14 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em seg., 31 de ago. de 2020 às 17:05, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
> escreveu:
> > So it seems Rainier needs to turn this test off, because it actually is
> > intentional.
> >
> No problem.
> If intentional, the code at TransactionIdPrecedes, already knows that
> overflow can occur
> and trusts that the compiler will save it.
I don't know what you mean with "saving" it. Again, unsigned integer
overflow is well specified in C. All that's needed is for the compiler
to implement normal C.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-08-31 20:56:36 | Re: Boundary value check in lazy_tid_reaped() |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-08-31 20:35:14 | Re: Clang UndefinedBehaviorSanitize (Postgres14) Detected undefined-behavior |