Re: list of extended statistics on psql

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: list of extended statistics on psql
Date: 2020-08-29 21:47:34
Message-ID: 20200829214734.u5zs66su2h3ezizn@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 07:53:23PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>+1 for the general idea, and +1 for \dX being the syntax to use
>
>IMO the per-type columns should show both the type being enabled as
>well as it being built.
>
>(How many more stat types do we expect -- Tomas? I wonder if having one
>column per type is going to scale in the long run.)
>

I wouldn't expect a huge number of types. I can imagine maybe twice the
current number of types, but not much more. But I'm not sure the output
is easy to read even now ...

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-08-29 21:54:58 Re: list of extended statistics on psql
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2020-08-29 17:48:44 Re: new heapcheck contrib module