| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | ajulien(at)shaktiware(dot)fr, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 35.9.2. Base Types in C-Language Functions |
| Date: | 2020-08-26 23:09:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20200826230904.GE13370@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:59:42PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/xfunc-c.html
> Description:
>
> In "Table 35-1. Equivalent C Types for Built-in SQL Types", when SQL type is
> "timestamp", the C type is reported to be "Timestamp * ", whereas it is
> actually "Timestamp". I experienced it in version 9.3 but I guess it is also
> the case in current version.
Ah, yes, you are right --- Timestamp is an int64. I will fix that with
the attatched patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| timestamp.diff | text/x-diff | 494 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-26 23:19:09 | Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-08-26 22:58:37 | Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error? |