From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error? |
Date: | 2020-08-25 22:10:28 |
Message-ID: | 20200825221028.GA24594@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2020-Aug-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I think so. If there are other places, it does not prevent improving
> what we already know needs improvement.
>
> FWIW, the layout I was thinking about is something like the patch
> attached.
This looks to me enough of an improvement that I +1 it, and yes this is
what I was imagining also.
(With the non-website stylesheet, as in the screenshot you showed, the
table looks somewhat crammed and visually unappealing; but the website
stylesheet looks pleasing enough. Screenshot attached.)
> I have only patched GIN to give an idea of the shape of the
> tables.
I suppose a commit would change all the index AMs where we document this
kind of thing.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
image/png | 43.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-25 22:17:28 | Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-08-25 19:27:33 | Re: Add comma after e.g. and i.e.? |