Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: 2020-08-25 14:06:25
Message-ID: 20200825140625.GF32540@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:44:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:01:00PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Sure, I can wait. Is this the only place where it would make sense?
>
> I think so. If there are other places, it does not prevent improving
> what we already know needs improvement.

Well, my point is that if this area looks different from other places,
it could look odd, so we can't always make incremental fixes to the
docs, though it might be fine in this case.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-08-25 18:36:19 Add comma after e.g. and i.e.?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-08-25 12:04:55 Re: initdb - creating clusters