From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, hoshiai(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance |
Date: | 2020-08-19 01:02:42 |
Message-ID: | 20200819.100242.344774172918617172.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I have looked into this.
> Hi,
>
> Attached is the rebased patch (v16) to add support for Incremental
> Materialized View Maintenance (IVM). It is able to be applied to
> current latest master branch.
>
> This also includes the following small fixes:
>
> - Add a query check for expressions containing aggregates in it
> - [doc] Add description about which situations IVM is effective or not in
> - Improve hint in log messages
> - Reorganize include directives in codes
- make check passed.
- make check-world passed.
- 0004-Allow-to-prolong-life-span-of-transition-tables-unti.patch:
This one needs a comment to describe what the function does etc.
+void
+SetTransitionTablePreserved(Oid relid, CmdType cmdType)
+{
- 0007-Add-aggregates-support-in-IVM.patch
"Check if the given aggregate function is supporting" shouldn't be
"Check if the given aggregate function is supporting IVM"?
+ * check_aggregate_supports_ivm
+ *
+ * Check if the given aggregate function is supporting
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-19 01:22:57 | prepared transaction isolation tests |
Previous Message | torikoshia | 2020-08-19 00:43:50 | Re: Creating a function for exposing memory usage of backend process |