Re: EDB builds Postgres 13 with an obsolete ICU version

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: EDB builds Postgres 13 with an obsolete ICU version
Date: 2020-08-18 00:44:35
Message-ID: 20200818004435.GA3813@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 02:23:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Also, is it the ICU library version we should be tracking for reindex,
> or each _collation_ version? If the later, do we store the collation
> version for each index?

You need to store the collation version(s) for each index. This
thread deals with the problem:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2367/
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com

That's not all of it as you would still need some filtering
capabilities in the backend to reindex only the collation-sensitive
indexes with a reindex, but that's one step forward into being able to
do that.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-08-18 00:47:28 Re: EDB builds Postgres 13 with an obsolete ICU version
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2020-08-17 23:54:20 Re: use pg_get_functiondef() in pg_dump