From: | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Arnaud Perrier" <arnaud(dot)perrier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16570: Collation not working |
Date: | 2020-08-05 20:31:42 |
Message-ID: | 20200805223142.5789792d@firost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:49:49 +0200
"Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> wrote:
[...]
> I'm wondering whether there is a discrepancy between the binary
> sort keys and results of direct comparisons by ucol_strcoll()
> for this collation.
[...]
This bug has been discussed back in 2018 and a customer hit it few weeks ago
as well. Here is my last analysis, various link to histories, a workaround and a
even an humble patch proposal to discuss:
I even sent a patch to the ICU community to add a regression test exposing the
bug, but I had no answer.
Hopefully the workaround is good enough for you.
Regards,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-05 21:30:59 | Re: BUG #16570: Collation not working |
Previous Message | Jan Kort | 2020-08-05 16:39:20 | Re: Index not used without explicit typecast |