From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
Date: | 2020-08-03 23:51:44 |
Message-ID: | 20200803235144.GA32443@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Aug-03, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> There was a lot of great discussion which ended up in Robert completing
> a much sought implementation of non-blocking ATTACH. DETACH was
> discussed too because it was a goal initially, but eventually dropped
> from that patch altogether. Nonetheless, that thread provided a lot of
> useful input to this implementation. Important ones:
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYg4x7AH=_QSptvuBKf+3hUdiCa4frPkt+RvXZyjX1n=w@mail.gmail.com
> [2] https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaAjkTibkEr=xJg3ndbRsHHSiYi2SJgX69MVosj=LJmug@mail.gmail.com
> [3] https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoY13KQZF-=HNTrt9UYWYx3_oYOQpu9ioNT49jGgiDpUEA@mail.gmail.com
There was some discussion about having a version number in the partition
descriptor somewhere as a means to implement this. I couldn't figure
out how that would work, or what the version number would be attached
to. Surely the idea wasn't to increment the version number to every
partition other than the one being detached?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-08-03 23:51:51 | Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-08-03 23:48:54 | ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |