Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Date: 2020-08-03 07:20:40
Message-ID: 20200803.162040.876495006040204008.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:00:14 -0400, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote in
> Greetings,
>
> * Kyotaro Horiguchi (horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > PostgreSQL server accepts only one CRL file. It is easy to expand
> > be_tls_init to accept a directory set in ssl_crl_file. But I'm not
> > sure CRL is actually even utilized in the field so that could ends
> > with just bloating the documentation.
> >
> > Is it work doing?
>
> Yes, CRLs are absolutely used in the field and having this would be
> nice.

Thanks for the opinion. I'll continue working on this.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message osdba 2020-08-03 07:35:29 Re:Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-08-03 07:19:37 Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?