Re: [PATCH] Tab completion for VACUUM of partitioned tables

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tab completion for VACUUM of partitioned tables
Date: 2020-07-29 11:05:57
Message-ID: 20200729110557.GA20350@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:41:16PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> whereas Query_for_list_of_vacuumables should search for:
>
> RELKIND_RELATION
> RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
> RELKIND_MATVIEW
> RELKIND_TOASTVALUE

FWIW, I don't think that we should make toast relations suggested to
the user at all for any command. This comes down to the same point
that we don't have pg_toast in search_path, and going down to this
level of operations is an expert-level mode, not something we should
recommend to the average user in psql IMO.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2020-07-29 12:03:35 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
Previous Message Amul Sul 2020-07-29 11:05:08 Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY